On 03.11.23 19:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.23 18:30, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
No point in defining a size for the mask if we're not going to use it.
I neither understand the patch description nor what the bug is that is
being fixed (and how that description relates to the patch
subject+description).
Please improve the patch description.
Should this be
"
KVM: s390: cpu model: use proper define for facility mask size
We're using S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64 instead of
S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64 to define the array size of the facility
mask. Let's properly use S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64. Note that both
values are the same and, therefore, this is a pure cleanup.
"
I'm not convinced there is a bug and that this deserves a "Fixes:".
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
