On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:10:15PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Since commit b03fc1173c0c ("bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops
> on compile-time constants"), the compilers are able to expand inline
> bitmap operations to compile-time initializers when possible.
> However, during the round of replacement if-__set-else-__clear with
> __assign_bit() as per Andy's advice, bloat-o-meter showed +1024 bytes
> difference in object code size for one module (even one function),
> where the pattern:
>
> DECLARE_BITMAP(foo) = { }; // on the stack, zeroed
>
> if (a)
> __set_bit(const_bit_num, foo);
> if (b)
> __set_bit(another_const_bit_num, foo);
> ...
>
> is heavily used, although there should be no difference: the bitmap is
> zeroed, so the second half of __assign_bit() should be compiled-out as
> a no-op.
> I either missed the fact that __assign_bit() has bitmap pointer marked
> as `volatile` (as we usually do for bitmaps) or was hoping that the
No, we usually don't. Atomic ops on individual bits is a notable exception
for bitmaps, as the comment for generic_test_bit() says, for example:
/*
* Unlike the bitops with the '__' prefix above, this one *is* atomic,
* so `volatile` must always stay here with no cast-aways. See
* `Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt` for the details.
*/
For non-atomic single-bit operations and all multi-bit ops, volatile is
useless, and generic___test_and_set_bit() in the same file casts the
*addr to a plain 'unsigned long *'.
> compilers would at least try to look past the `volatile` for
> __always_inline functions. Anyhow, due to that attribute, the compilers
> were always compiling the whole expression and no mentioned compile-time
> optimizations were working.
>
> Convert __assign_bit() to a macro since it's a very simple if-else and
> all of the checks are performed inside __set_bit() and __clear_bit(),
> thus that wrapper has to be as transparent as possible. After that
> change, despite it showing only -20 bytes change for vmlinux (due to
> that it's still relatively unpopular), no drastic code size changes
> happen when replacing if-set-else-clear for onstack bitmaps with
> __assign_bit(), meaning the compiler now expands them to the actual
> operations will all the expected optimizations.
>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/bitops.h | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
> index e0cd09eb91cd..f98f4fd1047f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
> @@ -284,14 +284,8 @@ static __always_inline void assign_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr,
> clear_bit(nr, addr);
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void __assign_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr,
> - bool value)
> -{
> - if (value)
> - __set_bit(nr, addr);
> - else
> - __clear_bit(nr, addr);
> -}
> +#define __assign_bit(nr, addr, value) \
> + ((value) ? __set_bit(nr, addr) : __clear_bit(nr, addr))
Can you protect nr and addr with braces just as well?
Can you convert the atomic version too, to keep them synchronized ?
>
> /**
> * __ptr_set_bit - Set bit in a pointer's value
> --
> 2.41.0
