Re: [PATCH net-next v3 09/18] net/smc: introduce SMC-D loopback device

[Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2023/9/22 07:32, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
>

<..>

> > +
> > +#ifndef _SMC_LOOPBACK_H
> > +#define _SMC_LOOPBACK_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <net/smc.h>
> > +
> > +#define SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS 5000
> > +
> > +struct smc_lo_dev {
> > +    struct smcd_dev *smcd;
> > +    struct device dev;
> > +};
> > +
> I'm just wondering why don't use pointer for dev?

The 'struct device' is a generic structure embeded, used to associate a Linux device
with a specific device. So I think variable for dev here is OK. See also struct ism_dev.

Thanks.

> > +int smc_loopback_init(void);
> > +void smc_loopback_exit(void);
> > +
> > +#endif /* _SMC_LOOPBACK_H */