On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 07:55:46PM +0800, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
> Use memdup_user_nul() helper instead of open-coding
> to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/char/hmcdrv_dev.c | 17 +++++------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/hmcdrv_dev.c b/drivers/s390/char/hmcdrv_dev.c
> index 8d50c894711f..504cdbf9998d 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/hmcdrv_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/hmcdrv_dev.c
> @@ -252,19 +252,12 @@ static ssize_t hmcdrv_dev_write(struct file *fp, const char __user *ubuf,
> fp, (long long) *pos, len);
>
> if (!fp->private_data) { /* first expect a cmd write */
> - fp->private_data = kmalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (!fp->private_data)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - if (!copy_from_user(fp->private_data, ubuf, len)) {
> - ((char *)fp->private_data)[len] = '\0';
> - return len;
> + fp->private_data = memdup_user_nul(ubuf, len);
> + if (IS_ERR(fp->private_data)) {
> + fp->private_data = NULL;
> + return PTR_ERR(fp->private_data);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is obviously broken. Sorry, but I'm not willing to review such
"trivial" cleanup patches for subtle bugs anymore - maybe you would
sooner or later succeed and I would apply such a broken patch.
Just don't send such patches; at least I won't take them.
