On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:29:36 +0200 Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There may be contents left in the upper 32 bits of executed_addr; hence > we should use a 64-bit load to make sure they are overwritten. > > Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > s390x/spec_ex.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/s390x/spec_ex.c b/s390x/spec_ex.c > index e3dd85dcb153..72b942576369 100644 > --- a/s390x/spec_ex.c > +++ b/s390x/spec_ex.c > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int psw_odd_address(void) > " larl %%r1,0f\n" > " stg %%r1,%[fixup_addr]\n" > " lpswe %[odd_psw]\n" > - "0: lr %[executed_addr],%%r0\n" > + "0: lgr %[executed_addr],%%r0\n" > : [fixup_addr] "=&T" (fixup_psw.addr), > [executed_addr] "=d" (executed_addr) > : [odd_psw] "Q" (odd)
