On 25.07.23 09:33, Simon Horman wrote: > Probably this is for 'net-next' rather than 'net'. Yes, this was meant for net-next. Sorry for the wrong prefix.
On 25.07.23 09:33, Simon Horman wrote: > Probably this is for 'net-next' rather than 'net'. Yes, this was meant for net-next. Sorry for the wrong prefix.