On 21.07.23 13:57, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
Single-stepping a kernel-emulated instruction that generates an
interrupt causes GDB to land on the instruction following it instead of
the respective interrupt handler.
The reason is that kvm_handle_sie_intercept(), after injecting the
interrupt, also processes the PER event and arranges a KVM_SINGLESTEP
exit. The interrupt is not yet delivered, however, so the userspace
sees the next instruction.
Fix by avoiding the KVM_SINGLESTEP exit when there is a pending
interrupt. The next __vcpu_run() loop iteration will arrange a
KVM_SINGLESTEP exit after delivering the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index 7cdd927541b0..d2f7940c5d03 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -583,6 +583,19 @@ static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return handle_instruction(vcpu);
}
+static bool should_handle_per_ifetch(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rc)
+{
+ /* Process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space. */
+ if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02))
+ return false;
+ if (rc != 0 && rc != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ return false;
+ if (guestdbg_sstep_enabled(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs)
+ /* __vcpu_run() will exit after delivering the interrupt. */
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int rc, per_rc = 0;
@@ -645,9 +658,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- /* process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space */
- if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02 &&
- (!rc || rc == -EOPNOTSUPP))
+ if (should_handle_per_ifetch(vcpu, rc))
per_rc = kvm_s390_handle_per_ifetch_icpt(vcpu);
return per_rc ? per_rc : rc;
}
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
