Re: [PATCH] docs: move s390 under arch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 07:10:55AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I guess this should go via Jonathan, like most (or all) other similar
> > patches? Jonathan, let me know if you pick this up, or if this should
> > go via the s390 tree.
> 
> I'm happy either way...I'd sort of thought these would go through the
> arch trees to minimize the conflict potential, but it hasn't happened
> that way yet.  Let me know your preference and I'll go with it...should
> you take it:
> 
> Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>

I'll take it. There will be a trivial merge conflict with the kexec Kconfig
rework that is sitting in Andrew's tree. In case there is more Kconfig
rework happining in the s390 tree this will avoid additional conflicts.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux