Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 6/6] s390x: add a test for SIE without MSO/MSL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/07/2023 10.35, Nico Boehr wrote:
Quoting Thomas Huth (2023-07-13 10:29:48)
[...]
diff --git a/s390x/sie-dat.c b/s390x/sie-dat.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b326995dfa85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/sie-dat.c
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Tests SIE with paging.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2023 IBM Corp.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *    Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <vmalloc.h>
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#include <mmu.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <alloc_page.h>
+#include <sclp.h>
+#include <sie.h>
+#include <snippet.h>
+
+static struct vm vm;
+static pgd_t *guest_root;
+
+/* keep in sync with TEST_PAGE_COUNT in s390x/snippets/c/sie-dat.c */
+#define GUEST_TEST_PAGE_COUNT 10
+
+/* keep in sync with TOTAL_PAGE_COUNT in s390x/snippets/c/sie-dat.c */
+#define GUEST_TOTAL_PAGE_COUNT 256

I'd maybe put the defines rather in a header a la s390x/snippets/c/sie-dat.h
and include that header here and in the snippet C code.

I'd have to

#include "../s390x/snippets/c/sie-dat.h"

and it feels like I shouldn't be doing this, should I?

Why "../s390x/" ? Isn't #include "snippets/c/sie-dat.h" enough? ... that would look reasonable to me.

 Thomas




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux