[PATCH v14 17/26] vfio: Move device_del() before waiting for the last vfio_device registration refcount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



device_del() destroys the vfio-dev/vfioX under the sysfs for vfio_device.
There is no reason to keep it while the device is going to be unregistered.

This movement is also a preparation for adding vfio_device cdev. Kernel
should remove the cdev node of the vfio_device to avoid new registration
refcount increment while the device is going to be unregistered.

Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 6d45caa1f9a0..294bb5ecfc1c 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -338,6 +338,9 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	 */
 	vfio_device_group_unregister(device);
 
+	/* Balances device_add in register path */
+	device_del(&device->device);
+
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 	rc = try_wait_for_completion(&device->comp);
 	while (rc <= 0) {
@@ -361,9 +364,6 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Balances device_add in register path */
-	device_del(&device->device);
-
 	/* Balances vfio_device_set_group in register path */
 	vfio_device_remove_group(device);
 }
-- 
2.34.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux