> > On Jun 20, 2023, at 7:46 AM, Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ static void collapse_and_free_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *v > addr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE); > mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); > pmd = pmdp_collapse_flush(vma, addr, pmdp); > - tlb_remove_table_sync_one(); > + tlb_remove_table_sync_one(mm); Can’t pmdp_collapse_flush() have one additional argument “freed_tables” that it would propagate, for instance on x86 to flush_tlb_mm_range() ? Then you would not need tlb_remove_table_sync_one() to issue an additional IPI, no? It just seems that you might still have 2 IPIs in many cases instead of one, and unless I am missing something, I don’t see why.
