On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:19:17 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:16:47AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > Not quite get why bit field is going to be incompatible with smp > > > lockless operations. Could you elaborate a bit? And should I define > > > the access_granted as u8 or "u8:1"? > > > > Perhaps FUD on my part, but load-acquire type operations have specific > > semantics and it's not clear to me that they interest with compiler > > generated bit operations. Thanks, > > They won't compile if you target bit ops, you can't take the address > of a bitfield. Yup, that's what I was assuming but was too lazy to prove it. Thanks, Alex
