RE: [PATCH v12 20/24] vfio: Only check group->type for noiommu test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 6:38 AM
> On Fri,  2 Jun 2023 05:16:49 -0700
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > group->type can be VFIO_NO_IOMMU only when vfio_noiommu option is true.
> > And vfio_noiommu option can only be true if CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU is enabled.
> > So checking group->type is enough when testing noiommu.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/group.c | 3 +--
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h  | 3 +--
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > index 41a09a2df690..653b62f93474 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > @@ -133,8 +133,7 @@ static int vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(struct vfio_group
> *group,
> >
> >  	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> >  	if (!IS_ERR(iommufd)) {
> > -		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> > -		    group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU)
> > +		if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU)
> >  			ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_set_no_iommu(iommufd);
> >  		else
> >  			ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_create(iommufd);
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > index 5835c74e97ce..1b89e8bc8571 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
> >
> >  static inline bool vfio_device_is_noiommu(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> >  {
> > -	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> > -	       vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> > +	return vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> >  }
> >
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
> 
> This patch should be dropped.  It's logically correct, but ignores that
> the config option can be determined at compile time and therefore the
> code can be better optimized based on that test.  I think there was a
> specific case where I questioned it, but this drops an otherwise valid
> compiler optimization.  Thanks,

Yes. in v11, you mentioned the compiler optimization and the fact that
vfio_noiommu can only be valid when VFIO_NOIOMMU is enabled. I'm
ok to drop this patch to keep the compiler optimization.

Regards,
Yi Liu




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux