On June 2, 2023 7:39:12 AM PDT, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 09:29:18AM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Right now we have that "minimum gcc version" in a somewhat annoying >> place: it's in the ./scripts/min-tool-version.sh file as a shell >> script. > >Something like so then? > >--- >Subject: parisc: Raise minimal GCC version >From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Date: Fri Jun 2 16:33:54 CEST 2023 > >With 64bit builds depending on __SIZEOF_INT128__ raise the parisc >minimum compiler version to gcc-11.0.0. > >All other 64bit architectures provide this from GCC-5.1.0 (and >probably before), except hppa64 which only started advertising this >with GCC-11. > >Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >--- > scripts/min-tool-version.sh | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >--- a/scripts/min-tool-version.sh >+++ b/scripts/min-tool-version.sh >@@ -17,7 +17,11 @@ binutils) > echo 2.25.0 > ;; > gcc) >- echo 5.1.0 >+ if [ "$SRCARCH" = parisc ]; then >+ echo 11.0.0 >+ else >+ echo 5.1.0 >+ fi > ;; > llvm) > if [ "$SRCARCH" = s390 ]; then Dumb question: is this only about the cpp macro or is it about __int128 existing at all?
