> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 9:26 PM
> > > +int vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> > > + return iommufd_device_to_id(vdev->iommufd_device);
> > > + if (vdev->noiommu_access)
> > > + return iommufd_access_to_id(vdev->noiommu_access);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_devid);
> >
> > I think these exemplify that it would be better if both emulated and
> > noiommu use the same iommufd_access pointer. Thanks,
>
> Sure. Then I shall rename this helper. vfio_iommufd_device_devid()
> What about your opinion?
>
Probably just vfio_iommufd_device_id().
