RE: [PATCH v5 09/10] vfio/pci: Extend VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO for vfio device cdev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 9:22 PM
> 
> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 6:02 AM
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:21:35 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >
> > static int vfio_hot_reset_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> >                                 struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_ctx)
> > {
> >         struct iommu_group *group;
> >         int devid;
> >
> >         if (!vdev)
> >                 return VFIO_PCI_DEVID_NOT_OWNED;
> >
> >         if (vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(vdev) == iommufd_ctx)
> >                 return vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(vdev);

Do we need to check the return of this helper? It returns -EINVAL
when iommufd_access and iommufd_device are both null. Though
not possible in this path. Is a WARN_ON needed or not?

Regards,
Yi Liu

> >
> >         group = iommu_group_get(vdev->dev);
> >         if (!group)
> >                 return VFIO_PCI_DEVID_NOT_OWNED;
> >
> >         if (iommufd_ctx_has_group(iommufd_ctx, group))
> >                 devid = VFIO_PCI_DEVID_OWNED;
> >
> >         iommu_group_put(group);
> >
> >         return devid;
> > }




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux