Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] cpuidle: Use local_clock_noinstr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 11:34 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> With the introduction of local_clock_noinstr(), local_clock() itself
> is no longer marked noinstr, use the correct function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c    |    8 ++++----
>  drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static noinstr void enter_s2idle_proper(
>
>         instrumentation_begin();
>
> -       time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> +       time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock_noinstr());
>
>         tick_freeze();
>         /*
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static noinstr void enter_s2idle_proper(
>         tick_unfreeze();
>         start_critical_timings();
>
> -       time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> +       time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock_noinstr());
>
>         dev->states_usage[index].s2idle_time += ktime_us_delta(time_end, time_start);
>         dev->states_usage[index].s2idle_usage++;
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ noinstr int cpuidle_enter_state(struct c
>         sched_idle_set_state(target_state);
>
>         trace_cpu_idle(index, dev->cpu);
> -       time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> +       time_start = ns_to_ktime(local_clock_noinstr());
>
>         stop_critical_timings();
>         if (!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE)) {
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ noinstr int cpuidle_enter_state(struct c
>         start_critical_timings();
>
>         sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event();
> -       time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock());
> +       time_end = ns_to_ktime(local_clock_noinstr());
>         trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
>
>         /* The cpu is no longer idle or about to enter idle. */
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cp
>  {
>         u64 time_start;
>
> -       time_start = local_clock();
> +       time_start = local_clock_noinstr();
>
>         dev->poll_time_limit = false;
>
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cp
>                                 continue;
>
>                         loop_count = 0;
> -                       if (local_clock() - time_start > limit) {
> +                       if (local_clock_noinstr() - time_start > limit) {
>                                 dev->poll_time_limit = true;
>                                 break;
>                         }
>

The above LGTM, but the teo governors uses local_clock() too.  Should
it use the _noinstr() version?



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux