Quoting Janosch Frank (2023-05-09 13:59:46)
[...]
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 3c3fe45085ec..7f70e3bbb44c 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -777,6 +777,11 @@ struct kvm_vm_stat {
> > u64 inject_service_signal;
> > u64 inject_virtio;
> > u64 aen_forward;
> > + u64 gmap_shadow_acquire;
> > + u64 gmap_shadow_r2;
> > + u64 gmap_shadow_r3;
> > + u64 gmap_shadow_segment;
> > + u64 gmap_shadow_page;
>
> This needs to be gmap_shadow_pgt and then we need a separate shadow page
> counter that's beeing incremented in kvm_s390_shadow_fault().
>
>
> I'm wondering if we should name them after the entries to reduce
> confusion especially when we get huge pages in the future.
>
> gmap_shadow_acquire
> gmap_shadow_r1_te (ptr to r2 table)
> gmap_shadow_r2_te (ptr to r3 table)
> gmap_shadow_r3_te (ptr to segment table)
> gmap_shadow_sg_te (ptr to page table)
> gmap_shadow_pg_te (single page table entry)
Yep, right, this was highly confusing to the point where I was also
confused by it. Will change that, thanks.
