Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 5/9] net/smc: Introduce an interface for getting DMB attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 08:17:47PM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
> On s390, since all OSs run on a kind of machine level hypervisor which
> is a partitioning hypervisor without paging, the sndbufs and DMBs in
> such case are unable to be mapped to the same physical memory.
> 
> However, in other scene, such as communication within the same OS instance
> (loopback) or between guests of a paging hypervisor (eg. KVM), the sndbufs
> and DMBs can be mapped to the same physical memory to avoid memory copy
> from sndbufs to DMBs.
> 
> So this patch introduces an interface to smcd_ops for users to judge
> whether DMB-map is available. And for reuse, the interface is designed
> to return DMB attribute, not only mappability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

...

> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ism.c b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> index 8ad4c71..1d97e77 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,14 @@ int smc_ism_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smc_buf_desc *dmb_desc)
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +bool smc_ism_dmb_mappable(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
> +{
> +	if (smcd->ops->get_dev_dmb_attr &&
> +	    (smcd->ops->get_dev_dmb_attr(smcd) & (1 << ISM_DMB_MAPPABLE)))

nit: this could use BIT(ISM_DMB_MAPPABLE)

> +		return true;
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  int smc_ism_register_dmb(struct smc_link_group *lgr, int dmb_len,
>  			 struct smc_buf_desc *dmb_desc)
>  {

...



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux