Quoting Pierre Morel (2023-04-27 16:50:16) [...] > >> diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg > >> index fc3666b..375e6ce 100644 > >> --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg > >> +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg > >> @@ -221,3 +221,6 @@ file = ex.elf > >> > >> [topology] > >> file = topology.elf > >> +# 3 CPUs on socket 0 with different CPU TLE (standard, dedicated, origin) > >> +# 1 CPU on socket 2 > >> +extra_params = -smp 1,drawers=3,books=3,sockets=4,cores=4,maxcpus=144 -cpu z14,ctop=on -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=1,entitlement=low -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=2,dedicated=on -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=10 -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=20 -device z14-s390x-cpu,core-id=130,socket-id=0,book-id=0,drawer-id=0 -append '-drawers 3 -books 3 -sockets 4 -cores 4' > > If I got the command line right, all CPUs are on the same drawer with this command line, aren't they? If so, does it make sense to run with different combinations, i.e. CPUs on different drawers, books etc? > > OK, I will add some CPU on different drawers and books. just to clarify: What I meant is adding an *additional* entry to unittests.cfg. Does it make sense in your opinion? I just want more coverage for different scenarios we may have.
