On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:01:27 +0200
Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:46:49PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:53:04 +0200
> > Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 03:48:34PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > > > This patch fixes a potential race in gmap_make_secure and removes the
> > > > last user of follow_page without FOLL_GET.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Fixes: 214d9bbcd3a6 ("s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests")
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > It would be helpful if this would be a bit more descriptive. "Fix
> > > race" is not very helpful :)
> > >
> > > What race does this fix?
> > > When can this happen?
> > > What are the consequences if the race window is being hit?
> >
> > We are locking something we don't have a reference to, and as explained
> > by Jason and David in this thread <Y9J4P/RNvY1Ztn0Q@xxxxxxxxxx> it can
> > lead to all kind of bad things, including the page getting
> > unmapped (MADV_DONTNEED), freed, reallocated as a larger folio and the
> > unlock_page() would target the wrong bit.
> >
> > Also there is another race with the FOLL_WRITE, which could race
> > between the follow_page and the get_locked_pte.
> >
> > The main point of the patch is to remove the last follow_page without
> > FOLL_GET or FOLL_PIN, removing the races can be considered a nice bonus.
>
> I've seen that discussion. What I'm actually asking for is that all of
> this information should be added to the commit description. Nobody
> will remember any of the details in one year.
I will put it in the patch description.
do you think the text above is enough?
