Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm/ksm: unmerge and clear VM_MERGEABLE when setting PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[...]


nit:
can we do:

     if (arg2)
    	error = ksm_enable_merge_any(me->mm);
	else
    	error = ksm_disable_merge_any(me->mm);
	mmap_write_unlock(me->mm);
	break;

Indeed, thanks.


diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index a959e8925413..813f7fbc1832 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -2520,6 +2520,22 @@ static void __ksm_add_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  		vm_flags_set(vma, VM_MERGEABLE);
  }

+static int __ksm_del_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MERGEABLE))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (vma->anon_vma) {
+		err = unmerge_ksm_pages(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	vm_flags_clear(vma, VM_MERGEABLE);
+	return 0;
+}
  /**
   * ksm_add_vma - Mark vma as mergeable if compatible
   *
@@ -2542,6 +2558,20 @@ static void ksm_add_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
  		__ksm_add_vma(vma);
  }

+static int ksm_del_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+	int err;
+
+	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, mm, 0);
+	for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
+		err = __ksm_del_vma(vma);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
  /**
   * ksm_enable_merge_any - Add mm to mm ksm list and enable merging on all
   *                        compatible VMA's
@@ -2569,6 +2599,23 @@ int ksm_enable_merge_any(struct mm_struct *mm)
  	return 0;
  }

+int ksm_disable_merge_any(struct mm_struct *mm)


I understand we want to keep the name "symmetric" with
ksm_enable_merge_any, but it also unmerges the ksm pages. Do we want to
reflect that in the function name?

ksm_disable_merge_any_umerge() is suboptimal.

As ksm_disable_merge_any() now reverts what ksm_enable_merge_any() ended up doing, I think it's just fine.

(it would be a different story if we'd be using "set" / "clear" terminology instead of "enable" / "disable").

We can describe that in the comment.


Can we add a comment for the function?

Can do for symmetry with ksm_enable_merge_any().

But note that I don't think documentation for functions is of any help when it takes longer to read the documentation than to read+understand the actual code.


+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (!test_bit(MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY, &mm->flags))
+		return 0;
+
+	err = ksm_del_vmas(mm);
+	if (err) {
+		ksm_add_vmas(mm);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	clear_bit(MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY, &mm->flags);


We only clear the MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY flag if there are no errors. Is this

I think this is the behavior we want. We tried to disable KSM for the process (previously enabled via the prctl), but cannot disable KSM. So we rollback our changes and return an error.

This is similar to trying to set MADV_UNMERGEABLE but failing. We leave the bit set.

what we want? This means that if the process creates new memory regions
they would still be marked as mergeable.

Yes, we failed the operation so we keep everything unchanged.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux