Hi Eric,
> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:00 PM
>
> Hi YI,
>
> On 4/1/23 16:44, Yi Liu wrote:
> > If the affected device is not opened by any user, it's safe to reset it
> > given it's not in use.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > index 65bbef562268..5d745c9abf05 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> > @@ -2429,10 +2429,18 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct
> vfio_device_set *dev_set,
> >
> > list_for_each_entry(cur_vma, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list) {
> > /*
> > - * Test whether all the affected devices are contained by the
> > - * set of groups provided by the user.
> > + * Test whether all the affected devices can be reset by the
> > + * user.
> > + *
> > + * Resetting an unused device (not opened) is safe, because
> > + * dev_set->lock is held in hot reset path so this device
> > + * cannot race being opened by another user simultaneously.
> > + *
> > + * Otherwise all opened devices in the dev_set must be
> > + * contained by the set of groups provided by the user.
> > */
> > - if (!vfio_dev_in_groups(cur_vma, groups)) {
> > + if (cur_vma->vdev.open_count &&
> > + !vfio_dev_in_groups(cur_vma, groups)) {
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > goto err_undo;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index 0552e8dcf0cb..f96e5689cffc 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -673,6 +673,14 @@ struct vfio_pci_hot_reset_info {
> > * VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 13,
> > * struct vfio_pci_hot_reset)
> > *
> > + * Userspace requests hot reset for the devices it uses. Due to the
> > + * underlying topology, multiple devices can be affected in the reset
> by the reset
> > + * while some might be opened by another user. To avoid interference
> s/interference/hot reset failure?
I don’t think user can really avoid hot reset failure since there may
be new devices plugged into the affected slot. Even user has opened
all the groups/devices reported by VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO,
the hot reset can fail if new device is plugged in and has not been
bound to vfio or opened by another user during the window of
_INFO and HOT_RESET.
maybe the whole statement should be as below:
To avoid interference, the hot reset can only be conducted when all
the affected devices are either opened by the calling user or not
opened yet at the moment of the hot reset attempt.
> > + * the calling user must ensure all affected devices, if opened, are
> > + * owned by itself.
> > + *
> > + * The ownership is proved by an array of group fds.
> > + *
> > * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > */
> > struct vfio_pci_hot_reset {
Regards,
Yi Liu
