On 13/03/2023 17:37, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 11/03/23 18:51, Qais Yousef wrote:
>> On 03/09/23 14:23, Hao Luo wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 10:55 PM Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/03/23 10:01, Hao Luo wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 2:20 AM Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/03/23 17:03, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>>>>>> On 03/01/23 15:26, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...]
>> Yeah I am working on 5.10 too (this will need to be backported to 5.10 and 5.15
>> ultimately) and had the same crash because task is NULL.
>>
>> Fixed it this way which I think what you intended to do Juri? It moves the
>> check for dl_task(task) inside cgroup_taskset_for_each() loop.
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> index 83a8943467fb..06d6bb68d86b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> @@ -2495,11 +2495,11 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
>> ret = security_task_setscheduler(task);
>> if (ret)
>> goto out_unlock;
>> - }
>>
>> - if (dl_task(task)) {
>> - cs->deadline_tasks++;
>> - cpuset_attach_old_cs->deadline_tasks--;
>> + if (dl_task(task)) {
>> + cs->deadline_tasks++;
>> + cpuset_attach_old_cs->deadline_tasks--;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>
> Duh, indeed.
>
>> Like Hao I don't have any deadline tasks in the system. With the fix above
>> I don't notice the delay on suspend resume using your patches.
>
> OK, cool.
>
>> If you want any debug; please feel free to add them into your branch so I can
>> run with that and give you the log.
>
> Will need to find time to run some tests with DEADLINE tasks, yeah.
> Maybe Dietmar, since you reported as well the issue above with your
> testing, you could help with testing DEADLINE?
Ah, now I see! It's the same issue I saw. And it's not specifically
related to DL tasks. Any tasks which you move into a cpuset will trigger
this.
Yeah, can do some DL tests later on this fix.
