Re: [net-next v2 0/8] drivers/s390/net/ism: Add generalized interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 29.01.23 12:48, Dust Li wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:17:44PM +0100, Jan Karcher wrote:
Previously, there was no clean separation between SMC-D code and the ISM
device driver.This patch series addresses the situation to make ISM available
for uses outside of SMC-D.
In detail: SMC-D offers an interface via struct smcd_ops, which only the
ISM module implements so far. However, there is no real separation between
the smcd and ism modules, which starts right with the ISM device
initialization, which calls directly into the SMC-D code.
This patch series introduces a new API in the ISM module, which allows
registration of arbitrary clients via include/linux/ism.h: struct ism_client.
Furthermore, it introduces a "pure" struct ism_dev (i.e. getting rid of
dependencies on SMC-D in the device structure), and adds a number of API
calls for data transfers via ISM (see ism_register_dmb() & friends).
Still, the ISM module implements the SMC-D API, and therefore has a number
of internal helper functions for that matter.
Note that the ISM API is consciously kept thin for now (as compared to the
SMC-D API calls), as a number of API calls are only used with SMC-D and
hardly have any meaningful usage beyond SMC-D, e.g. the VLAN-related calls.

Hi,

Great work ! This makes the SMC & ISM code much more clear !

I like this patchset, just some questions on this refactor.
I still see there are some SMC related code in
'drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c', mainly to implement smcd_ops.

As ISM is the lower layer of SMC, I think remove the dependency
on SMC would be better ? Do you have any plan to do that ?

Since SMC is the main user of the ISM currently, we still want to keep the dependency for now, Sure, I agree with you, in the future we should remove the dependency.

One more thing:
I didn't find any call for smcd_ops->set_vlan_required/reset_vlan_required,
looks it's not needed, so why not remove it, am I missed something ?

You didn't miss anything, that’s just for the usage in case

Thanks!


v1 -> v2:
  Removed s390x dependency which broke config for other archs.

Stefan Raspl (8):
  net/smc: Terminate connections prior to device removal
  net/ism: Add missing calls to disable bus-mastering
  s390/ism: Introduce struct ism_dmb
  net/ism: Add new API for client registration
  net/smc: Register SMC-D as ISM client
  net/smc: Separate SMC-D and ISM APIs
  s390/ism: Consolidate SMC-D-related code
  net/smc: De-tangle ism and smc device initialization

drivers/s390/net/ism.h     |  19 +-
drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 376 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/ism.h        |  98 ++++++++++
include/net/smc.h          |  24 +--
net/smc/af_smc.c           |   9 +-
net/smc/smc_clc.c          |  11 +-
net/smc/smc_core.c         |  13 +-
net/smc/smc_diag.c         |   3 +-
net/smc/smc_ism.c          | 180 ++++++++++--------
net/smc/smc_ism.h          |   3 +-
net/smc/smc_pnet.c         |  40 ++--
11 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/ism.h

--
2.25.1



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux