Re: [PATCH] s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:27:33 -0700
Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230123075356.60847-1-hch@lst.de>
References: <20230123075356.60847-1-hch@lst.de>

On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:53:56 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> s390 iterates over the bio using bio_for_each_segment and doesn't need
> any bio splitting.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits
      commit: a2aea8f56f9ee995aeabeb633b708024a3be5281

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/9] mm/hugetlb: convert hugetlb_wp() to take in a folio
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] s390/dcssblk:: don't call bio_split_to_limits
Next by thread: [net-next v2 0/8] drivers/s390/net/ism: Add generalized interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux