RE: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove iommu_map_atomic()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove iommu_map_atomic()
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:45:56 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ath11k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ath11k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <2-v2-ce66f632bd0d+484-iommu_map_gfp_jgg@nvidia.com>
References: <0-v2-ce66f632bd0d+484-iommu_map_gfp_jgg@nvidia.com> <2-v2-ce66f632bd0d+484-iommu_map_gfp_jgg@nvidia.com>
Thread-index: AQHZK2bagr0H4LUfwUaLMUvC3iPvl66lGiyQ
Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove iommu_map_atomic()

> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 2:01 AM
> 
> There is only one call site and it can now just pass the GFP_ATOMIC to the
> normal iommu_map().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH v2 00/10] Let iommufd charge IOPTE allocations to the memory cgroup
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove iommu_map_atomic()
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/intel: Support the gfp argument to the map_pages op
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove iommu_map_atomic()
Next by thread: [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/intel: Add a gfp parameter to alloc_pgtable_page()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]