On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 6:01 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > > Why not just use `u128` from types.h in this file? > > Ordering, I can't very well introduce it in types.h while other > definitions exist in the tree. So I first have to clean up the u128 > namespace. Is there a patch at the end of the series that adds it back in to use u128?
