Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Unbind smc control from tcp control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 23/11/2022 12:13, Tony Lu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:58:30AM +0100, Jan Karcher wrote:
In the past SMC used the values of tcp_{w|r}mem to create the send
buffer and RMB. We now have our own sysctl knobs to tune them without
influencing the TCP default.

This patch removes the dependency on the TCP control by providing our
own initial values which aim for a low memory footprint.
+1, before introducing sysctl knobs of SMC, we were going to get rid of
TCP and have SMC own values. Now this does it, So I very much agree with
this.

Signed-off-by: Jan Karcher <jaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst |  4 ++--
  net/smc/smc_core.h                      |  6 ++++--
  net/smc/smc_sysctl.c                    | 10 ++++++----
  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst
index 6d8acdbe9be1..a1c634d3690a 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ smcr_testlink_time - INTEGER
wmem - INTEGER
  	Initial size of send buffer used by SMC sockets.
-	The default value inherits from net.ipv4.tcp_wmem[1].
+	The default value aims for a small memory footprint and is set to 16KiB.
The minimum value is 16KiB and there is no hard limit for max value, but
  	only allowed 512KiB for SMC-R and 1MiB for SMC-D.
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ wmem - INTEGER
rmem - INTEGER
  	Initial size of receive buffer (RMB) used by SMC sockets.
-	The default value inherits from net.ipv4.tcp_rmem[1].
+	The default value aims for a small memory footprint and is set to 64KiB.
The minimum value is 16KiB and there is no hard limit for max value, but
  	only allowed 512KiB for SMC-R and 1MiB for SMC-D.
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 285f9bd8e232..67c3937f341d 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -206,8 +206,10 @@ struct smc_rtoken {				/* address/key of remote RMB */
  	u32			rkey;
  };
-#define SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE 16384 /* minimum size of an RMB */
-#define SMC_RMBE_SIZES		16	/* number of distinct RMBE sizes */
+#define SMC_SNDBUF_INIT_SIZE 16384 /* initial size of send buffer */
+#define SMC_RCVBUF_INIT_SIZE 65536 /* initial size of receive buffer */
+#define SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE	 16384	/* minimum size of an RMB */
+#define SMC_RMBE_SIZES		 16	/* number of distinct RMBE sizes */
  /* theoretically, the RFC states that largest size would be 512K,
   * i.e. compressed 5 and thus 6 sizes (0..5), despite
   * struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm.rmbe_size being a 4 bit value (0..15)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
index b6f79fabb9d3..a63aa79d4856 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
  #include "smc_llc.h"
  #include "smc_sysctl.h"
-static int min_sndbuf = SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
-static int min_rcvbuf = SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
+static int initial_sndbuf	= SMC_SNDBUF_INIT_SIZE;
+static int initial_rcvbuf	= SMC_RCVBUF_INIT_SIZE;
+static int min_sndbuf		= SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
+static int min_rcvbuf		= SMC_BUF_MIN_SIZE;
static struct ctl_table smc_table[] = {
  	{
@@ -88,8 +90,8 @@ int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
  	net->smc.sysctl_autocorking_size = SMC_AUTOCORKING_DEFAULT_SIZE;
  	net->smc.sysctl_smcr_buf_type = SMCR_PHYS_CONT_BUFS;
  	net->smc.sysctl_smcr_testlink_time = SMC_LLC_TESTLINK_DEFAULT_TIME;
-	WRITE_ONCE(net->smc.sysctl_wmem, READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_wmem[1]));
-	WRITE_ONCE(net->smc.sysctl_rmem, READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_rmem[1]));
+	WRITE_ONCE(net->smc.sysctl_wmem, initial_sndbuf);
+	WRITE_ONCE(net->smc.sysctl_rmem, initial_rcvbuf);
Maybe we can use SMC_{SND|RCV}BUF_INIT_SIZE macro directly, instead of
new variables.
The reason i created the new variables is that min_{snd|rcv}buf also 
have their own variables. I know it is not needed but thought it was 
cleaner.
If you have a strong opinion on using the value directly i can change 
it. Please let me know if you want it changed.
- Jan
Cheers,
Tony Lu

return 0; --
2.34.1


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux