On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:04:37AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > It mentions something about sparc32/64. I hope this isn't relevant > any longer (honestly I have no idea about that). It shouldn't. sparc is using fairly generic code now.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:04:37AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > It mentions something about sparc32/64. I hope this isn't relevant > any longer (honestly I have no idea about that). It shouldn't. sparc is using fairly generic code now.