[PATCH v2] s390/vfio-ap: GISA: sort out physical vs virtual pointers usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fix virtual vs physical address confusion (which currently are the same)
for the GISA when enabling the IRQ.

Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1->v2:
* remove useless cast

 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 0b4cc8c597ae..205a00105858 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static struct ap_queue_status vfio_ap_irq_enable(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
 
 	aqic_gisa.isc = nisc;
 	aqic_gisa.ir = 1;
-	aqic_gisa.gisa = (uint64_t)gisa >> 4;
+	aqic_gisa.gisa = virt_to_phys(gisa) >> 4;
 
 	status = ap_aqic(q->apqn, aqic_gisa, h_nib);
 	switch (status.response_code) {
-- 
2.37.3




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux