On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:11:06AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:11:50AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > In RDMA patches, you wrote that GFP_USER is not legal flag either. So it > > is better to WARN here for everything that is not allowed. > > So __GFP_COMP is actually problematic and changes behavior, and I plan > to lift an optimization from the arm code to the generic one that > only rounds up allocations to the next page size instead of the next > power of two, so I need this check now. Other flags including > GFP_USER are pretty bogus to, but I actually need to do a full audit > before rejecting them, which I've only done for GFP_COMP so far. ok, let's do it later. Thanks
