On 11/8/22 16:26, Nico Boehr wrote:
Fix virtual vs physical address confusion (which currently are the same)
for the GISA when enabling the IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 0b4cc8c597ae..20859cabbced 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static struct ap_queue_status vfio_ap_irq_enable(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
aqic_gisa.isc = nisc;
aqic_gisa.ir = 1;
- aqic_gisa.gisa = (uint64_t)gisa >> 4;
+ aqic_gisa.gisa = (uint64_t)virt_to_phys(gisa) >> 4;
I'd suggest doing s/uint64_t/u64/ or s/uint64_t/unsigned long/ but I'm
wondering if (u32)(u64) would be more appropriate anyway.
@halil @christian ?
status = ap_aqic(q->apqn, aqic_gisa, h_nib);
switch (status.response_code) {
