RE: [PATCH v1 4/7] vfio/ccw: move private to mdev lifecycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 12:22 AM
> 
> @@ -101,15 +101,20 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_probe(struct
> mdev_device *mdev)
>  {
>  	struct subchannel *sch = to_subchannel(mdev->dev.parent);
>  	struct vfio_ccw_parent *parent = dev_get_drvdata(&sch->dev);
> -	struct vfio_ccw_private *private = dev_get_drvdata(&parent->dev);
> +	struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	if (private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER)
> -		return -ENODEV;

Not familiar with ccw but just want to double confirm this removal
is intentional w/o side-effect?

> +	private = vfio_ccw_alloc_private(sch);
> +	if (!private)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
>  	ret = vfio_init_device(&private->vdev, &mdev->dev,
> &vfio_ccw_dev_ops);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(private);
>  		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&parent->dev, private);
> 
>  	VFIO_CCW_MSG_EVENT(2, "sch %x.%x.%04x: create\n",
>  			   sch->schid.cssid,
> @@ -123,6 +128,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device
> *mdev)
>  	return 0;
> 
>  err_put_vdev:
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&parent->dev, NULL);

No need to set drvdata to NULL, iiuc




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux