On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:13:28AM -0500, Yury Norov wrote: > Because it's related to bitmap API usage and has been revealed after > some work in bitmaps. So first of all, that "fix" needs to explain what exactly it is fixing. Not "it fixes this and that warning" but why the input arg to cpumask_next() cannot be nr_cpu_ids because... yadda yadda... > And because nobody else cares. Why do you assume that? > If you're willing to move it yourself please go ahead. If it fixes a real issue, we are taking it. And pls note that x86 patches go through the tip tree. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette