Re: [PATCH v3 rcu 08/11] arch/s390: Add ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:23:49AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 07:16:44AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am 20.10.22 um 00:58 schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > > The s390 architecture uses either a cmpxchg loop (old systems)
> > > or the laa add-to-memory instruction (new systems) to implement
> > > this_cpu_add(), both of which are NMI safe.  This means that the old
> > > and more-efficient srcu_read_lock() may be used in NMI context, without
> > > the need for srcu_read_lock_nmisafe().  Therefore, add the new Kconfig
> > > option ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS to arch/arm64/Kconfig, which will
> > 						s390 ?

Ah, this typo is what Christian pointed out; missed that.

> > > cause NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE to be deselected, thus preserving the current
> > > srcu_read_lock() behavior.
> > > 
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220910221947.171557773@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > > ---
> > >   arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Not sure what Christian was trying to say with his empty reply :)
> In any case:
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux