Re: [PATCH v2 14/44] cpuidle,cpu_pm: Remove RCU fiddling from cpu_pm_{enter,exit}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 12:17, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All callers should still have RCU enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  kernel/cpu_pm.c |    9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu_pm.c
> @@ -30,16 +30,9 @@ static int cpu_pm_notify(enum cpu_pm_eve
>  {
>         int ret;
>
> -       /*
> -        * This introduces a RCU read critical section, which could be
> -        * disfunctional in cpu idle. Copy RCU_NONIDLE code to let RCU know
> -        * this.
> -        */
> -       ct_irq_enter_irqson();
>         rcu_read_lock();
>         ret = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_pm_notifier.chain, event, NULL);
>         rcu_read_unlock();
> -       ct_irq_exit_irqson();
>
>         return notifier_to_errno(ret);
>  }
> @@ -49,11 +42,9 @@ static int cpu_pm_notify_robust(enum cpu
>         unsigned long flags;
>         int ret;
>
> -       ct_irq_enter_irqson();
>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_pm_notifier.lock, flags);
>         ret = raw_notifier_call_chain_robust(&cpu_pm_notifier.chain, event_up, event_down, NULL);
>         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_pm_notifier.lock, flags);
> -       ct_irq_exit_irqson();
>
>         return notifier_to_errno(ret);
>  }
>
>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux