> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2022 8:08 PM
>
>
> > As discussed in a side thread a note might be added to exempt calling
> > kAPI outside of the iommu driver.
>
> Sadly, not really.. The driver is responsible to santize this if it is
> relevant. It is the main downside of this approach.
>
Better provide a clarification on what sanitization means.
e.g. I don't think we should change errno in those kAPIs to match the
definition in iommu subsystem since e.g. -EINVAL really means different
things in different context.
So the sanitization in iommu driver is probably that:
- If an external kAPI returns -EINVAL, convert it to -ENODEV given iommu
domain is iommu internal object hence unlikely for external kAPIs to
capture incompatibility issue between domain/device;
- Otherwise just pass whatever returned to the caller, following the definition
of "Same behavior as -ENODEV" above
Thanks
Kevin
