On 29.08.22 16:53, liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: liuyacan <liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For passive connections, the refcount increment has been done in
smc_clcsock_accept()-->smc_sock_alloc().
Fixes: 3b2dec2603d5("net/smc: restructure client and server code in af_smc")
Signed-off-by: liuyacan <liuyacan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 79c1318af..0939cc3b9 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1855,7 +1855,6 @@ static void smc_listen_out_connected(struct smc_sock *new_smc)
{
struct sock *newsmcsk = &new_smc->sk;
- sk_refcnt_debug_inc(newsmcsk);
if (newsmcsk->sk_state == SMC_INIT)
newsmcsk->sk_state = SMC_ACTIVE;
Good catch! Thank you for the patch! But fixes should go to the net-next
tree.
