On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:49:13PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote: > Now that neither vfio_ccw_sch_probe() nor vfio_ccw_mdev_probe() > affect the FSM state, it doesn't make sense for their _remove() > counterparts try to revert things in this way. Since the FSM open > and close are handled alongside MDEV open/close, these are > unnecessary. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 1 - > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-) When I first saw this I wondered if the CLOSE might be to expedite the userspace closing the FD or something, but we have ops->request() which is supposed to be doing that, so it doesn't really make sense even if that was the issue. Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> Jason
