Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Update vfio_pin/unpin_pages API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 16:12:19 -0700
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 04:11:29PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> 
> > GVT-g explodes for me with this series on my Broadwell test system,
> > continuously spewing the following:  
> 
> Thank you for running additional tests.
> 
> > [   47.348778] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 501 at drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:978 vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages+0x7b/0x100 [vfio_iommu_type1]  
>  
> > Line 978 is the WARN_ON(i != npage) line.  For the cases where we don't
> > find a matching vfio_dma, I'm seeing addresses that look maybe like
> > we're shifting  a value that's already an iova by PAGE_SHIFT somewhere.  
> 
> Hmm..I don't understand the PAGE_SHIFT part. Do you mind clarifying?

The iova was a very large address for a 4GB VM with a lot of zeros on
the low order bits, ex. 0x162459000000.  Thanks,

Alex
 
> And GVT code initiated an unpin request from gvt_unpin_guest_pag()
> that is currently unpinning one page at a time on a contiguous IOVA
> range, prior to this series. After this series, it leaves the per-
> page routine to the internal loop of vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(),
> which is supposed to do the same.
> 
> So, either resulted from the npage input being wrong or some other
> factor weighed in that invoked a vfio_remove_dma on those iovas?
> 
> Thanks
> Nic
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux