On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 04:17:20AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > OK... Do you prefer it to go through s390 tree? The thing is, I've > stuff in iov_iter tree that conflicts with it; I'll gladly drop that > bit (vfs.git #fixes-s390) in favour of your series (and drop s390 > bits from "new iov_iter flavour - ITER_UBUF" in #work.iov_iter - they > are not needed anymore). > > I can put your series into replacement of #fixes-s390, or pull it > from whatever static branch you put it into - up to you. > Preferences? Hi Al, I am preparing a branch for you. Will retest it and let you know once it is done. Thanks!
