On 7/12/22 09:45, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 7/11/22 14:30, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
>> On 7/11/22 10:41, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> We report a topology change to the guest for any CPU hotplug.
>>>
>>> The reporting to the guest is done using the Multiprocessor
>>> Topology-Change-Report (MTCR) bit of the utility entry in the guest's
>>> SCA which will be cleared during the interpretation of PTF.
>>>
>>> On every vCPU creation we set the MCTR bit to let the guest know the
>>> next time it uses the PTF with command 2 instruction that the
>>> topology changed and that it should use the STSI(15.1.x) instruction
>>> to get the topology details.
>>>
>>> STSI(15.1.x) gives information on the CPU configuration topology.
>>> Let's accept the interception of STSI with the function code 15 and
>>> let the userland part of the hypervisor handle it when userland
>>> supports the CPU Topology facility.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> See nit below.
>>> ---
>>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> index 8fcb56141689..70436bfff53a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> @@ -1691,6 +1691,32 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> +/**
>>> + * kvm_s390_update_topology_change_report - update CPU topology change report
>>> + * @kvm: guest KVM description
>>> + * @val: set or clear the MTCR bit
>>> + *
>>> + * Updates the Multiprocessor Topology-Change-Report bit to signal
>>> + * the guest with a topology change.
>>> + * This is only relevant if the topology facility is present.
>>> + *
>>> + * The SCA version, bsca or esca, doesn't matter as offset is the same.
>>> + */
>>> +static void kvm_s390_update_topology_change_report(struct kvm *kvm, bool val)
>>> +{
>>> + union sca_utility new, old;
>>> + struct bsca_block *sca;
>>> +
>>> + read_lock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
>>> + do {
>>> + sca = kvm->arch.sca;
>>
>> I find this assignment being in the loop unintuitive, but it should not make a difference.
>
> The price would be an ugly cast.
I don't get what you mean. Nothing about the types changes if you move it before the loop.
>
>
>>
>>> + old = READ_ONCE(sca->utility);
>>> + new = old;
>>> + new.mtcr = val;
>>> + } while (cmpxchg(&sca->utility.val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
>>> + read_unlock(&kvm->arch.sca_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>> [...]
>>
>
>
