> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2022 1:08 AM
>
> @@ -202,12 +210,32 @@ int iommu_device_register(struct iommu_device
> *iommu,
> spin_lock(&iommu_device_lock);
> list_add_tail(&iommu->list, &iommu_device_list);
> spin_unlock(&iommu_device_lock);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(iommu_buses); i++) {
> + struct bus_type *bus = iommu_buses[i];
> + int err;
> +
> + if (bus->iommu_ops && bus->iommu_ops != ops) {
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + } else {
> + bus->iommu_ops = ops;
> + err = bus_iommu_probe(bus);
> + }
> + if (err) {
> + iommu_device_unregister(iommu);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
Probably move above into a new function bus_iommu_probe_all():
/* probe all buses for devices associated with this iommu */
err = bus_iommu_probe_all();
if (err) {
iommu_device_unregister(iommu);
return err;
}
Just my personal preference on leaving logic in iommu_device_register()
more relevant to the iommu instance itself.
Apart from that:
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
