On 6/17/22 09:42, John Garry wrote:
On 17/06/2022 17:33, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 6/17/22 03:55, John Garry wrote:
@@ -276,7 +275,7 @@ static bool bt_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap,
unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
else
tags = hctx->tags;
- if (!reserved)
+ if (!iter_data->reserved)
bitnr += tags->nr_reserved_tags;
/*
* We can hit rq == NULL here, because the tagging functions
Is the above change really necessary?
It's not totally necessary. Since local variable 'reserved' would now
only be used once I thought it was better to get rid of it.
I can keep it if you really think that is better.
I'd prefer that these changes are either left out or that these are
moved into a separate patch. I think that will make this patch series
easier to review.
Thanks,
Bart.
