On 14/06/2022 12.38, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On 5/31/22 12:15, Thomas Huth wrote:
The memop test currently does not have any output (unless one of the
TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user whether
a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or not. Let's
make this a little bit more user-friendly and include some TAP output
via the kselftests.h interface.
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index 49f26f544127..e704c6fa5758 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
[...]
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
- int memop_cap, extension_cap;
+ int memop_cap, extension_cap, idx;
setbuf(stdout, NULL); /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
+ ksft_print_header();
+
memop_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
extension_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
if (!memop_cap) {
- print_skip("CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported");
- exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+ ksft_exit_skip("CAP_S390_MEM_OP not supported.\n");
}
- test_copy();
- if (extension_cap > 0) {
- test_copy_key();
- test_copy_key_storage_prot_override();
- test_copy_key_fetch_prot();
- test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override();
- test_errors_key();
- test_termination();
- test_errors_key_storage_prot_override();
- test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled();
- test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled();
- } else {
- print_skip("storage key memop extension not supported");
+ ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist));
+
+ for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) {
+ if (testlist[idx].extension >= extension_cap) {
This is reversed, should be
if (testlist[idx].extension <= extension_cap) {
or
if (extension_cap >= testlist[idx].extension) {
Drat! The patch is already in Paolo's queue ... could you please send a
patch to fix this, so that Paolo can either squash it (not sure whether
that's still feasible) or queue it, too?
I'd prefer the latter.
Me too.
Thanks,
Thomas
