On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:49:28 +0200
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > + key_to_set = i * 2;
> > + set_storage_key(pagebuf[i], key_to_set, 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> > + (void)getchar();
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> > + report_prefix_pushf("page %d", i);
> > +
> > + actual_key.val = get_storage_key(pagebuf[i]);
>
> iske is nice but I think it would also be interesting to check if the
> actual memory protection was carried over. The iske check is enough for
> now though.
we had that in a previous version, but I think it's overkill, there are
separate tests to check for key protection, I think?
also, under TCG the value of the storage keys is migrated, but there is
no protection, this makes the test unnecessarily complex
[...]
