* Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch provides a ~12% perf boost on my aarch64 test VM with a simple
> program sequentially dirtying 400MB shmem file being mmap()ed and these are
> the time it needs:
>
> Before: 650.980 ms (+-1.94%)
> After: 569.396 ms (+-1.38%)
Nice!
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Minor comment typo:
> + /*
> + * We should do the same as VM_FAULT_RETRY, but let's not
> + * return -EBUSY since that's not reflecting the reality on
> + * what has happened - we've just fully completed a page
> + * fault, with the mmap lock released. Use -EAGAIN to show
> + * that we want to take the mmap lock _again_.
> + */
s/reflecting the reality on what has happened
/reflecting the reality of what has happened
> ret = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, fault_flags, NULL);
> +
> + if (ret & VM_FAULT_COMPLETED) {
> + /*
> + * NOTE: it's a pity that we need to retake the lock here
> + * to pair with the unlock() in the callers. Ideally we
> + * could tell the callers so they do not need to unlock.
> + */
> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> + *unlocked = true;
> + return 0;
Indeed that's a pity - I guess more performance could be gained here,
especially in highly parallel threaded workloads?
Thanks,
Ingo
