Re: [PATCH 17/30] tracing: Improve panic/die notifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/2022 08:45, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
> DIE_OOPS and PANIC_NOTIFIER are from different enum.
> It feels like comparing apples with oranges here.
> 
> IMHO, the proper way to unify the two notifiers is
> a check of the @self parameter. Something like:
> 
> static int trace_die_panic_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
> 				unsigned long ev, void *unused)
> {
> 	if (self == trace_die_notifier && val != DIE_OOPS)
> 		goto out;
> 
> 	ftrace_dump(ftrace_dump_on_oops);
> out:
> 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
> 
> Best Regards,
> Petr

OK Petr, thanks - will implement your suggestion in V2 (CC Steven)

Cheers!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux