On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 10:17 +0200, Nico Boehr wrote: > On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 18:47 +0200, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote: > > On 5/16/22 11:07, Nico Boehr wrote: [...] > > > + expected_key.val = i * 2; > > > + > > > + /* ignore reference bit */ > > > > Why? Are there any implicit references I'm missing? > > Since the PoP specifies (p. 5-122): > > "The record of references provided by the reference > bit is not necessarily accurate. However, in the major- > ity of situations, reference recording approximately > coincides with the related storage reference." > > I don't really see a way to test this properly. > > Maybe I missed something? No I think you're right, although in practice the reference bits should match. Or did you observe a mismatch?
